I realize the concept is a struggle for you to grasp but here it is again. When one's response to a proposition is to say something about the person who made it rather than about the proposition, you have nothing to say.
Deleting such remarks is not censorship, it is saving space.
I think you struggle to grasp it mate. You posted a rubbish video, said something mocking about the Koran, and continue to insult other religions with adjectives like 'barbaric' and 'insane'. I think the appropriate response to mindless bigorty is questioning the motives of the bigot. I'm sorry if this 'irrational' methodoly is foreign and offensive to you, but I will persue it.
That is the Torquemada logic. Vindicating one's ideology or religion by personal attacks on those who don't agree with you.
Your 'methodology' as you call it (That is a misuse of the word by the way. Methodology is the study of method. The word you are looking for is 'method'.) has been abjured by all civilized peoples since the end of the wars of religion in Europe three hundred years ago.
As to your pursuing it anyway, feel free to. But not here.
You sound awfully like the irrelevant intellectual, though thats a tag I don't think many would give to you. I've never encountered such an obtuse bigoted man (Who apparantly is both well read and travelled) Answer for your bigotry, for once, rather than ignore it. You really need to examine your own shallowness.
Jack, once again you have admirably responded to one of the more pathetic sets of comments to your posts. I suppose it is instructive for you to display for your readers the work of someone who misspells critical words, misuses other words, and displays other evidence of an aggressively sloppy intellect, but it really is a waste of space. Please delete any further drivel from "Anonymous".
I don't think I'd know how to. Its a bit like a heroin addiction; I don't know how I started, get no enjoyment from it anymore but feel compelled to check Jack's blog. I feel irritated unless I post something. This brings a momentary relief but the compulsion is still there.
Jack should feel privileged that he manages to get up people's skin like this!
Comments containing personal abuse will be deleted.
ReplyDeleteHow did that in any way contain personal abuse? Might as well add censorship to the charge of bigotry.
ReplyDeleteI realize the concept is a struggle for you to grasp but here it is again. When one's response to a proposition is to say something about the person who made it rather than about the proposition, you have nothing to say.
ReplyDeleteDeleting such remarks is not censorship, it is saving space.
I think you struggle to grasp it mate. You posted a rubbish video, said something mocking about the Koran, and continue to insult other religions with adjectives like 'barbaric' and 'insane'. I think the appropriate response to mindless bigorty is questioning the motives of the bigot. I'm sorry if this 'irrational' methodoly is foreign and offensive to you, but I will persue it.
ReplyDeleteThat is the Torquemada logic. Vindicating one's ideology or religion by personal attacks on those who don't agree with you.
ReplyDeleteYour 'methodology' as you call it (That is a misuse of the word by the way. Methodology is the study of method. The word you are looking for is 'method'.) has been abjured by all civilized peoples since the end of the wars of religion in Europe three hundred years ago.
As to your pursuing it anyway, feel free to. But not here.
You sound awfully like the irrelevant intellectual, though thats a tag I don't think many would give to you. I've never encountered such an obtuse bigoted man (Who apparantly is both well read and travelled) Answer for your bigotry, for once, rather than ignore it. You really need to examine your own shallowness.
ReplyDeleteJack, once again you have admirably responded to one of the more pathetic sets of comments to your posts. I suppose it is instructive for you to display for your readers the work of someone who misspells critical words, misuses other words, and displays other evidence of an aggressively sloppy intellect, but it really is a waste of space. Please delete any further drivel from "Anonymous".
ReplyDeletePedant.
ReplyDeleteI think the proper response would be if you find the things Jack says offensive than don't read his blog.
ReplyDeleteYou donkey's hind end.
I don't think I'd know how to. Its a bit like a heroin addiction; I don't know how I started, get no enjoyment from it anymore but feel compelled to check Jack's blog. I feel irritated unless I post something. This brings a momentary relief but the compulsion is still there.
ReplyDeleteJack should feel privileged that he manages to get up people's skin like this!